<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for @SanjayMathur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sanjay.mathur.ws</link>
	<description>thoughts on cars, technology and business. and whatever else strikes me today :-)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:16:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making Hamachi2 a trusted network on Windows 7 by Sanjay Mathur » Making Hamachi2 a trusted network on Windows 7 &#124; NerdXpress</title>
		<link>http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/2009/09/23/making-hamachi2-a-trusted-network-on-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay Mathur » Making Hamachi2 a trusted network on Windows 7 &#124; NerdXpress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/2009/09/23/making-hamachi2-a-trusted-network-on-windows-7/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Read It Later and Xmarks Firefox extensions plus RIL iPhone App by Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/2009/06/08/read-it-later-and-xmarks-firefox-extensions-plus-ril-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanjay.mathur.ws/2009/06/08/read-it-later-and-xmarks-firefox-extensions-plus-ril-iphone-app/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>So far seems to be working ok, though sometimes it still gets wacky with Xmarks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far seems to be working ok, though sometimes it still gets wacky with Xmarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Read It Later and Xmarks Firefox extensions plus RIL iPhone App by Chris</title>
		<link>http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/2009/06/08/read-it-later-and-xmarks-firefox-extensions-plus-ril-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanjay.mathur.ws/2009/06/08/read-it-later-and-xmarks-firefox-extensions-plus-ril-iphone-app/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>How did it work out? I am trying to sync a mac and two PCs and seems to be working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did it work out? I am trying to sync a mac and two PCs and seems to be working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter Weekly Updates for 2008-11-16 by Peter Kazanjy</title>
		<link>http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/2008/11/16/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2008-11-16/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kazanjy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanjay.mathur.ws/2008/11/16/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2008-11-16/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>B-?  That&#039;s not very impressive.

If you&#039;re having particular issues, we&#039;d invite you to the forums to get help, here: www.vmware.com/go/fusionforums

Hopefully you can get some help there.

~Pete Kazanjy
VMware Fusion Product Marketing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B-?  That&#8217;s not very impressive.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re having particular issues, we&#8217;d invite you to the forums to get help, here: <a href="http://www.vmware.com/go/fusionforums" rel="nofollow">http://www.vmware.com/go/fusionforums</a></p>
<p>Hopefully you can get some help there.</p>
<p>~Pete Kazanjy<br />
VMware Fusion Product Marketing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VC views on opportunity sizing by sanjay mathur &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Follow-up from RRE Post</title>
		<link>http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/2008/11/08/vc-views-on-opportunity-sizing/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>sanjay mathur &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Follow-up from RRE Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 07:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanjay.mathur.ws/2008/11/08/vc-views-on-opportunity-sizing/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] Original comment here, Five Years Too Late – RRE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original comment here, Five Years Too Late – RRE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VC views on opportunity sizing by Eric Wiesen</title>
		<link>http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/2008/11/08/vc-views-on-opportunity-sizing/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Wiesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 00:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanjay.mathur.ws/2008/11/08/vc-views-on-opportunity-sizing/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Sanjay - just to clarify a bit of my post on &quot;What we want to hear&quot;, I think you have hit the nail on the head when you ask the question - how do we find ideas that are big enough? It&#039;s not that teams or their ideas aren&#039;t good enough. But one of the first lessons any investor learns (hopefully the easy, academic way and not the difficult, practical way) is that success in a small market just, well, doesn&#039;t matter very much. If you are targeting a $50 million market, even if you are hugely successful and take 50% market share, you top out at a $25 million business. That&#039;s a good business, but if you step back and think about it from the investor perspective, it doesn&#039;t justify the level of risk.

In that example, imagine that you actually get to $25 million in year 5 and can sell it for 4X revenues (in a market where there&#039;s virtually no headroom for growth, this is optimistic, but let&#039;s assume it anyway). You&#039;ve got a $100M exit. That&#039;s a nice exit. If I invested in you at $10M post-money valuation, I&#039;m looking at a 10X return, and that&#039;s a great return.

The problem, as I hopefully communicated at Five Years Too Late, is that we cannot simply assume that you will achieve best-case scenario. We have to discount for the very real possibility that you will not. Further, the rosy scenario where I fund this company at $10M and it exits for $100M and I make 10X assumes that they never need to take additional capital, which is a rare outcome. If another round needs to be raised, I am looking at having to put in more money at a higher valuation (but with the same upside) and probably taking dilution from new investors.

Now this is the world in which early-stage investors live in, and that&#039;s fine. We know that it&#039;s going to take a lot to get a new company to a big outcome, and that the process is fraught with risks. We are making bets on very speculative companies by their very nature. Without the belief in a big exit, it just doesn&#039;t make sense. If you prefer the MBA approach, the discount rate required for this type of investing makes those investments with limited upside of questionable value when you consider the time it will take to get there in most cases.

So ultimately, I think you are looking at this the right way, the way I suggest on the blog. Entrepreneurs who want a firm like RRE to invest should try to have a product and market vision that&#039;s large enough to justify the type of valuation that a Series A venture-backed company requires. Alternately, there are other investors who may be interested in companies promising smaller outcomes, but if they are rational they will need to envision lower risk to make the math work. There are examples of investors who invest in high-IP, post-development/pre-market companies where they believe risk has been taken off the table. These investments can have a lower upside and still make sense.

Hope this is helpful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanjay &#8211; just to clarify a bit of my post on &#8220;What we want to hear&#8221;, I think you have hit the nail on the head when you ask the question &#8211; how do we find ideas that are big enough? It&#8217;s not that teams or their ideas aren&#8217;t good enough. But one of the first lessons any investor learns (hopefully the easy, academic way and not the difficult, practical way) is that success in a small market just, well, doesn&#8217;t matter very much. If you are targeting a $50 million market, even if you are hugely successful and take 50% market share, you top out at a $25 million business. That&#8217;s a good business, but if you step back and think about it from the investor perspective, it doesn&#8217;t justify the level of risk.</p>
<p>In that example, imagine that you actually get to $25 million in year 5 and can sell it for 4X revenues (in a market where there&#8217;s virtually no headroom for growth, this is optimistic, but let&#8217;s assume it anyway). You&#8217;ve got a $100M exit. That&#8217;s a nice exit. If I invested in you at $10M post-money valuation, I&#8217;m looking at a 10X return, and that&#8217;s a great return.</p>
<p>The problem, as I hopefully communicated at Five Years Too Late, is that we cannot simply assume that you will achieve best-case scenario. We have to discount for the very real possibility that you will not. Further, the rosy scenario where I fund this company at $10M and it exits for $100M and I make 10X assumes that they never need to take additional capital, which is a rare outcome. If another round needs to be raised, I am looking at having to put in more money at a higher valuation (but with the same upside) and probably taking dilution from new investors.</p>
<p>Now this is the world in which early-stage investors live in, and that&#8217;s fine. We know that it&#8217;s going to take a lot to get a new company to a big outcome, and that the process is fraught with risks. We are making bets on very speculative companies by their very nature. Without the belief in a big exit, it just doesn&#8217;t make sense. If you prefer the MBA approach, the discount rate required for this type of investing makes those investments with limited upside of questionable value when you consider the time it will take to get there in most cases.</p>
<p>So ultimately, I think you are looking at this the right way, the way I suggest on the blog. Entrepreneurs who want a firm like RRE to invest should try to have a product and market vision that&#8217;s large enough to justify the type of valuation that a Series A venture-backed company requires. Alternately, there are other investors who may be interested in companies promising smaller outcomes, but if they are rational they will need to envision lower risk to make the math work. There are examples of investors who invest in high-IP, post-development/pre-market companies where they believe risk has been taken off the table. These investments can have a lower upside and still make sense.</p>
<p>Hope this is helpful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone 3G vs. Windows Mobile (HTC Touch Dual) by Dave</title>
		<link>http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/2008/07/14/iphone-3g-vs-windows-mobile-htc-touch-dual/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanjay.mathur.ws/archives/iphone-3g-vs-windows-mobile-htc-touch-dual#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I submitted feedback to Apple in my first week using the iPhone requesting a phone number field or something in meeting notices. Several updates (including the big 2.0) later and I&#039;m still waiting...

The conference call thing isn&#039;t so tricky. I assign a number (labelled conference) to the contact using &quot;pause&quot; (hit the +*# button, a pause button will appear) between the phone number and conference code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I submitted feedback to Apple in my first week using the iPhone requesting a phone number field or something in meeting notices. Several updates (including the big 2.0) later and I&#8217;m still waiting&#8230;</p>
<p>The conference call thing isn&#8217;t so tricky. I assign a number (labelled conference) to the contact using &#8220;pause&#8221; (hit the +*# button, a pause button will appear) between the phone number and conference code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone post 2.1 upgrade by HP</title>
		<link>http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/2008/09/15/iphone-post-21-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>HP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanjay.mathur.ws/archives/iphone-post-21-upgrade#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Very disappointing!  I was hoping I could finally jump on the bandwagon, but looks like it&#039;s still not ready for primetime.  It&#039;s a bizarre world where Windows has a more stable mobile OS than Apple!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very disappointing!  I was hoping I could finally jump on the bandwagon, but looks like it&#8217;s still not ready for primetime.  It&#8217;s a bizarre world where Windows has a more stable mobile OS than Apple!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone 3G vs. Windows Mobile (HTC Touch Dual) by anonEmus</title>
		<link>http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/2008/07/14/iphone-3g-vs-windows-mobile-htc-touch-dual/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>anonEmus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanjay.mathur.ws/archives/iphone-3g-vs-windows-mobile-htc-touch-dual#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I completely agree w/your wanting it to dial into a bridgeline from the invite. I&#039;ll take it a step further... when a meeting is due it launches the dialer and asks if you want to dial in. Once dialed in it asks you if you want to submit the conference code... or would allow you to set a pause (3 seconds perhaps) and then automatically enter the passcode for the bridgeline. As a (lame) workaround I manually enter the bridgeline number in my contacts (for standing meetings only) in the form &quot;Z meetinghost XXXXXXX&quot; where meeting host is the name of the meeting hose and XXXXXXXX is the conference code you have to input after you&#039;ve dialed into the main conference number. This allows me to easily dial into the meeting and presents to me the conference code upto the time when I have to enter the keypad. That way I only have to memorize 5 digits (which is still ridiculus) for a few seconds. Hopefully Apple will fix this.... especially when they have so many other elegantly designed features on the phone and they are trying to break into the enterprise market. Should be a (simple?)software fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree w/your wanting it to dial into a bridgeline from the invite. I&#8217;ll take it a step further&#8230; when a meeting is due it launches the dialer and asks if you want to dial in. Once dialed in it asks you if you want to submit the conference code&#8230; or would allow you to set a pause (3 seconds perhaps) and then automatically enter the passcode for the bridgeline. As a (lame) workaround I manually enter the bridgeline number in my contacts (for standing meetings only) in the form &#8220;Z meetinghost XXXXXXX&#8221; where meeting host is the name of the meeting hose and XXXXXXXX is the conference code you have to input after you&#8217;ve dialed into the main conference number. This allows me to easily dial into the meeting and presents to me the conference code upto the time when I have to enter the keypad. That way I only have to memorize 5 digits (which is still ridiculus) for a few seconds. Hopefully Apple will fix this&#8230;. especially when they have so many other elegantly designed features on the phone and they are trying to break into the enterprise market. Should be a (simple?)software fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When We Left Earth &#8211; Discovery by Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://sanjay.mathur.ws/index.php/2008/07/02/when-we-left-earth-discovery/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanjay.mathur.ws/archives/when-we-left-earth-discovery#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Interesting. The neighborhood we lived in when I was in high school was also named after the Challenger astronauts.  I lived on Jarvis Lane :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. The neighborhood we lived in when I was in high school was also named after the Challenger astronauts.  I lived on Jarvis Lane <img src='http://sanjay.mathur.ws/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

